Compare phones
LG Flare
LX165| Global Score | |
| 28.5 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2005-11-08 |
| 3.54 x 1.85 x 0.78 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.72 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 137 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 170 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c is slightly better than the LG Flare, having a 31.2 score against 28.5. Motorola RAZR V3c's construction is extremely thinner but heavier than LG Flare. The LG Flare counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a way worse 160 x 128 resolution.
LG Flare and Motorola RAZR V3c count with very similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola RAZR V3c captures greater photographs and videos than LG Flare. Motorola RAZR V3c features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Flare. The Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the battery lifetime in LG Flare, although the Motorola RAZR V3c has just 740mAh battery size.
Motorola RAZR V3c not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the LG Flare.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.