Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-07-13 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is slightly better than LG Fortune 3, with a 71.5 score against 67.2. The Galaxy S III Cricket design has the same thickness than LG Fortune 3, but it's just a little lighter. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version and LG Fortune 3 has Android 10 version.
LG Fortune 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the LG Fortune 3 also counts with 6 more cores. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a more vivid display than LG Fortune 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher display pixel density.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than LG Fortune 3, because it has 16 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB. The LG Fortune 3 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, a same size sensor and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Fortune 3 also has a much larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The LG Fortune 3 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than LG Fortune 3, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.