Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.99 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2, having an 82 score against 75.2. The Apple iPhone XR body is incredibly newer and thinner, but heavier than the LG G Flex 2. The LG G Flex 2 has a much better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density and a slightly higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The iPhone XR has a bit more powerful processor than LG G Flex 2, although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor and less cores , they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit.
LG G Flex 2 and Apple iPhone XR both have extremely similar battery performance, although the Apple iPhone XR has a 2% lower battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XR shoots much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.