Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2, getting a global score of 80 against 75.2. Google Pixel 3's construction is notably newer, somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than LG G Flex 2. The LG G Flex 2 has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit worse count of pixels per display inch, they both have a display with the same size.
LG G Flex 2 features just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU.
LG G Flex 2 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 captures better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels and a lower video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.