Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a design is much newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than LG G Flex 2. These phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives some nice extra features and increased performance.
The LG G Flex 2 features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a GPU. The LG G Flex 2 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit smaller screen.
Google Pixel 3a features a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower video definition and a lesser mega pixels camera. LG G Flex 2 counts with a slightly bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a's battery lifetime is very similar to the LG G Flex 2 one.
Google Pixel 3a is a bit more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.