Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. These devices include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, giving a couple additional features. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is incredibly newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2.
The LG G Flex 2 has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The LG G Flex 2 features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processor.
The Google Pixel 3a XL shoots better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video quality. LG G Flex 2 features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with greater battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the LG G Flex 2, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.