Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. The Google Pixel 4 design is way newer and thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, although it's just a little bit heavier. The LG G Flex 2 has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit processing unit.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, although it has a quite lower pixels density, a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution. The LG G Flex 2 has slightly more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
Google Pixel 4 has a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse video quality and a lesser mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The LG G Flex 2 has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G Flex 2, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.