Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the LG G Flex 2, with an 82.9 score against 75.2. Google Pixel 4 XL is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than LG G Flex 2, but it is much heavier. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a just a bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite smaller screen.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional GPU. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera. The Google Pixel 4 XL features longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.