Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's score of 75.2. The Google Pixel 4a is a way newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a little lighter than LG G Flex 2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The LG G Flex 2 features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit lower pixel number in each inch of screen and a little smaller display. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. Google Pixel 4a shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lesser MP back-facing camera.
Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.