Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the LG G Flex 2's global score of 75.2. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it offers lots of additional features and increased performance. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit heavier than LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and incredibly newer.
LG G Flex 2 has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller screen. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit processor.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a superior storage to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution camera and a lower video resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.