Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than the LG G Flex 2, having an 85.3 score against 75.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives you a couple additional features and improved performance. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's design is way newer and much thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, although it's incredibly heavier.
LG G Flex 2 features a little bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a lot smaller display and a lot lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G Flex 2 features just a little better performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics processor. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse video quality and a lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.