Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2, with an 81.9 score against 75.2. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and also a lot newer. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, providing you a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better looking display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, a just a bit greater display pixels density and a bigger screen. The LG G Flex 2 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 5 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a really longer battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.