Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the LG G Flex 2, with an 86.3 score against 75.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the LG G Flex 2, although it's somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
LG G Flex 2 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better looking display than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera with a much higher resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.