Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the LG G Flex 2, having an 87.1 score against 75.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, but it is also way heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Flex 2 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper display than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.