Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-01-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, offering a lot of extra features. Motorola Moto Z Force's design is newer and way thinner, but just a little bit heavier than LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a little worse pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, they both have a screen with the same size. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a superior performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor, an extra graphics processor and 4 more cpu cores. The Moto Z Force features a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with a way higher 21 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force has just a little better battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Moto Z Force, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.