Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gray and Red | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the LG G Flex 2's general score of 75.2. Even though Moto Z3 is just a bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and also notably newer. These phones include Android operating system, but the Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a brighter display than Moto Z3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little smaller screen and a just a little inferior pixel number per display inch. Moto Z3 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a GPU. The Moto Z3's battery duration is very similar to the LG G Flex 2 one. The Moto Z3 counts with a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lower resolution camera.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some money, you can get LG G Flex 2, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.