Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gray and Red | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play is slightly better than the LG G Flex 2, having a 76.3 score against 75.2. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play construction is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but also a little heavier than LG G Flex 2. LG G Flex 2 counts with a brighter screen than Moto Z3 Play, although it has a quite lower display density, a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a GPU.
Moto Z3 Play has a battery performance that is very similar to the LG G Flex 2 one. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play takes much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Moto Z3 Play is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto Z3 Play, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.