Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is slightly better than LG G Flex 2, having a 78.5 score against 75.2. Even though Motorola One Action is somewhat heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's a little thinner and a lot newer. LG G Flex 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Action, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor.
LG G Flex 2 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit worse pixels density. The Motorola One Action features a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower video definition and a worse resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola One Action counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action features just a bit better battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 17% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.