Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2, getting a 79.8 score against 75.2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has the newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives a couple nice extra features. Although Motorola One Hyper is notably heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's a bit thinner and also extremely newer.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each display inch. Motorola One Hyper has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU. Motorola One Hyper has a very superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has longer battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.