Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. The Motorola One Vision body is way newer and a bit thinner than LG G Flex 2's, although it is somewhat heavier. LG G Flex 2 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processor.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, although it has a just a little worse display density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Motorola One Vision captures much better photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Vision has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.