Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than the LG G Flex 2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
The LG G Flex 2 has a brighter screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a just a little greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. LG G Flex 2 has a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional graphics processor.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
LG G Flex 2 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.