Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. Nokia 9 PureView is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, although it is also heavier. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little smaller display and much lesser pixels per screen inch.
The LG G Flex 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 9 PureView features a better camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels resolution and a lower video definition. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.