Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a extremely newer device than LG G Flex 2, but it's extremely heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 5S has 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a little bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. The LG G Flex 2 features a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way more MP back camera. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better memory for apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G Flex 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.