Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has an overall score of 77, which is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy A20s design is much newer and thinner than LG G Flex 2's, although it is also heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A20s has 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Flex 2 features a quite superior performance than Galaxy A20s, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics processing unit. The LG G Flex 2 has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A20s counts with just a bit better camera than LG G Flex 2. Both have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy A20s has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A20s has superior battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.