Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a general score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. The Galaxy A30 design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A30, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a just a little worse pixels density.
The LG G Flex 2 has a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy A30 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A30 features improved battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A30 takes much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A30 also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.