Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A30s has 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, offering lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy A30s construction is newer and thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it is just a little bit heavier.
LG G Flex 2 has a better processor than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional GPU. LG G Flex 2 counts with a way better screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Galaxy A30s features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A30s has improved battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A30s shoots much better photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A30s also has a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.