Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Gray and Red | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0. Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a extremely newer device, and it is also much lighter and thinner than the LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little worse display pixels density and a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution. LG G Flex 2 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only shoots greater photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much better battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.