Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the LG G Flex 2, with an 83.8 score against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than LG G Flex 2, although it's also a little bit heavier. LG G Flex 2 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A50, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit.
LG G Flex 2 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy A50 counts with a better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a much higher 25 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A50 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has improved battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.