Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than LG G Flex 2's global score of 75.2. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little bit lower screen density and a bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.