Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A6 is just a little heavier than LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and notably newer. The LG G Flex 2 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per display inch and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A6 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The LG G Flex 2 features a superior CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also has a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A6's battery lifetime is just as good as the LG G Flex 2 one. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a back camera with a better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A6 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.