Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2, with a 76.9 score against 75.2. Even though Galaxy A70 is heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A70 has 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Flex 2 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processor. The LG G Flex 2 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy A70 has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The LG G Flex 2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A70. Both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.