Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than LG G Flex 2, having an 87.5 score against 75.2. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, offering a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The Samsung Galaxy A71 design is a lot newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density. The LG G Flex 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy A71 features much more storage to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a really longer battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes much better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.