Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has a more recent 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, but it is also heavier.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display density. The LG G Flex 2 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much better photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.