Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is much better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, but it is heavier. The LG G Flex 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra GPU.
LG G Flex 2 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a very superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with greater battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.