Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than LG G Flex 2, having an 85.2 score against 75.2. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives you some additional features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a much newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than LG G Flex 2, although it is also extremely heavier.
The LG G Flex 2 features a little sharper display than Galaxy F41, although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy F41, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a lot better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.