Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. The Galaxy Fold body is newer and notably thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, but it's also much heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing the user some additional features.
LG G Flex 2 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bit CPU. The LG G Flex 2 has a better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy Fold takes better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse video quality and a worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold features a way better battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G Flex 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.