Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 global score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some extra features. The Galaxy M20 body is newer and a little bit thinner than the LG G Flex 2's, although it is also heavier.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a more powerful processor than Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. LG G Flex 2 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse display density.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a very superior storage for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a slightly better camera than LG G Flex 2. Both of them have a back facing camera with a 13 mega-pixels resolution, the same video quality and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.