Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is slightly better than LG G Flex 2, with an 82.4 score against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy M30 construction is much newer and thinner than LG G Flex 2's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M30 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density. LG G Flex 2 features a greater processing power than Galaxy M30, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M30 captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2. They have a 13 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy M30 has a way better battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.