Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than LG G Flex 2, having a general score of 90.8 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also much heavier than the LG G Flex 2. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
The LG G Flex 2 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a really longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.