Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it's a little heavier. LG G Flex 2 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an additional GPU.
The LG G Flex 2 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a quite smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition captures better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.