Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 score. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Although Galaxy S10 is just a little bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and much newer.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. LG G Flex 2 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10, although it has a little smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot less pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S10 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.