Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. Although Galaxy S10 5G is much heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's somewhat thinner and also way newer. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, providing a couple additional features.
The LG G Flex 2 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a quite smaller display and a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch. The LG G Flex 2 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy S10 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a really longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than LG G Flex 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.