Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. Although the Galaxy S10 Lite is heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and noticeably newer. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior storage to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a really longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.