Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 is just a little bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's thinner and also notably newer. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing some extra features.
LG G Flex 2 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU. LG G Flex 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20, although it has a much worse pixel number per inch in the display, a bit smaller display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 features better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 captures way better videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.