Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the LG G Flex 2, with a overall score of 90.8 against 75.2. Galaxy S20 FE's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than the LG G Flex 2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, offering some nice extra features.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. LG G Flex 2 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit lower pixel count per inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Galaxy S20 FE has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures way better photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a lower resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.