Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG G Flex 2, having a 98 score against 75.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it's a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, counting with some nice extra features.
The LG G Flex 2 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a little less pixels per display inch and a really smaller screen. The LG G Flex 2 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.