Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 is much better than the LG G Flex 2, with a score of 91.8 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S21 is a newer and thinner device than LG G Flex 2, although it is also heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 has newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
The LG G Flex 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S21, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a little bit better display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit bigger display and a bit better pixel number per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S21 counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S21 captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S21 counts with better battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S21 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S21, else you can save some money and buy the LG G Flex 2, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.