Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than LG G Flex 2, with a score of 93.4 against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than LG G Flex 2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, providing the user some additional features.
LG G Flex 2 has a bit better performance than Galaxy S22, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy S22 features a bit sharper display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features greater battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.