Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the LG G Flex 2, having a overall score of 95.4 against 75.2. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much newer and just a little bit thinner device than the LG G Flex 2, although it's also much heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bigger display and a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features much more memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some money, you can get LG G Flex 2, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.