Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | -- |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2, having a overall score of 82.6 against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 design is extremely lighter and notably thinner than the LG G Flex 2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Flex 2 features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bigger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S25 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S25 has greater battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.